Saturday, April 7, 2012

Review Of The Moral Landscape By Sam Harris

Review Of The Moral Landscape By Sam Harris
In one of the greatest memorable examples in The Usefulness Notion, Sam Harris reflects on his own discrimination after his wife told him that substitute man had blatantly flirted with her in the gym, raze then again she had alleged she was a happily married woman. Sam Harris imagines how men in certain cultures would possess reacted to this information. The first thing a man should do if he want to keep his conceit is to overwhelm the rivaling male, possibly kill him too. In some gear it would besides possess been ethnically true to retaliate the wife for.... well I don't take its toll... sub knowingly tempting the man to approach her? In foolish gear it would possess been true to besides kill the wife, just to emphasise the way in which your brand is not to be meddled with!

Sam Harris admits that he foremost did feel estrangement towards the additional male (something which I think men world wide will sympathise with). He felt that his style was accusation. Bar, having been brought up in a western society he did not accept via on these feelings. He realized that slaughter the additional person would not lead to positive outcomes for everybody, and he realized that it was enormously not his wife's idiosyncrasy. In jab, he besides thinks that his wife is attractive and can understand that substitute man finds her attractive too.

The tack thesis of Sam Harris book is that just like statements about the world can be right or accusation (for example, it is accusation to say pulverized is even out), precise statements can besides be right or accusation. In the role of makes an act/policy/moral directive right or wrong? Proper according to Harris this is position by the degree to which it increases/decreased the well being of humans. For group who come by their philosophy, this is in essence a advisable squabble. Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Scrape argued that exhibit are no unfaltering imperatives (as Kant alleged). Whether something is good or sight depends on the penalty. In so doing it can be good to lie if it prevents dreariness in a lot of people. To sum the effect of a certain act on the well being of the rest of the world is of itinerary a cut above or less improbable. For example, frequent lying can end relationships leading to divorce, leading to depressions etc etc...

Harris acknowledges that exhibit is large dark flex someplace it is hard to say if a certain action or precise directive aids indiscriminate well being or not. This does not mean motionless, that whatever goes. Bar, some acts, such as slaughter substitute man and your wife in the same way as of tangential flirtation is fatally questionable to lead to best quality well being. It is analogous to arguing that the pulverized I'd thoroughly 6000 excitement old - not agreed improbable but fatally fatally questionable.

Helpfully put, some precise procedure or cultural norms are a cut above conducive towards human well being than others.

Cool everyday people (possibly notably academics vivacious splendid lives), would dispute that cultural norms are thoroughly cultural and that we should not chide additional cultures for holding certain way of life, in the same way as way of life are random etc. Bar, raze together with cultural relativists exhibit are few people who dispute this way as soon as discussing grave acts. Can people who contain themselves to be cultural relativists prompt from judgement and bother as soon as they no-win situation about say Josef Fritzl or the genocide in Rwanda. Would they be impassive to whether their infantile were raised in Josef Fritzl's tomb, or in a Tutsi family experiencing harm from Hutu band. Are these alternatives thoroughly an compelling cultural alternative? In the role of reasoned parent would not wish their schoolboy to grow up in a western society with limited care order and a police intimidation that protects their citizens?

Can we not say that the genocide in Rwanda was wrong? Can we not betray the upright code of the catholic clerical as soon as they excommunicate a doctor for the stage an abortion on a girl raped by her inaugurate and having a baby with twins, however not excommunicating a single Nazi? If we can it follows that we can say something about which norms are good and bad.

Reference: quickpua.blogspot.com

0 comments:

Post a Comment